The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has denied making any commitment on zoning its presidential ticket ahead of the 2027 elections.
The party’s National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, said the claim of “broken promises” made by allies of former Anambra State Governor Peter Obi was misleading.
“You cannot break any promise you have not made,” Abdullahi told journalists yesterday, stressing that zoning had not been discussed by the ADC leadership.
Dr Yunusa Tanko, National Coordinator of the Obidients Movement, had criticised the ADC over its silence on zoning the presidency to the South, Nation.
Tanko, whose movement supports Obi’s presidential ambition, warned that issues of equity and fairness must guide the party’s decisions. “As the Obidient Movement, being part of the main consulting bloc, we are particularly concerned about how the party intends to zone its presidential ticket,” Tanko said.
“Considering that the presidency is currently held by the South, issues of fairness and inclusivity will enable us to mobilise effectively across the country,” he added.
In response, Abdullahi described Tanko’s remarks as “highly divisive and destabilising,” arguing that they did not reflect the position of Peter Obi. “ADC leaders have not discussed zoning.
Tanko’s view does not reflect Obi’s position,” Abdullahi declared, questioning whether Tanko had consulted Obi before making the statement. He insisted that only legitimate stakeholders could contribute to such sensitive discussions, adding that Tanko “does not play any role in the coalition.”
The controversy comes days after the ADC asked all political heavyweights within its caucus to resign from their current parties and formally join the ADC, Vanguard reported.
That meeting was attended by leaders such as former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, former Rivers state Governor Rotimi Amaechi, and former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai. Obi, however, was absent.
According to Abdullahi, while the ADC may consider concessions in future, it “cannot condone vituperation from those who lack an understanding of the party’s workings.”