Confusion erupted on social media after a voice note and written statement, allegedly issued by the son of Labour Party presidential candidate Peter Obi, circulated widely in defense of his character. The materials, which appeared to respond to accusations and viral posts, have now been confirmed to be artificially generated.

The voice recording, styled in a manner to sound natural and emotionally persuasive, was initially shared as an authentic reaction. Alongside it came a text-based defense attributed to Obi’s son, insisting on his integrity. However, multiple fact-checkers and independent digital investigators have clarified that both the audio and the text are products of artificial intelligence.

Users on X (formerly Twitter) pointed out that the voice bore markers of synthetic generation, and further analysis revealed linguistic and tonal inconsistencies that betrayed its AI origin. Similarly, the written post, though coherent, carried subtle patterns typical of machine-assisted output rather than organic human expression.

Adding to the storm, some accounts had also shared AI-fabricated images in attempts to malign Obi’s son, portraying him in misleading contexts. These, too, were swiftly debunked.

The incident has reignited debates about the growing danger of AI-driven misinformation in Nigeria’s political space. As the 2027 elections draw closer, analysts warn that manipulated audio, video, and text could become increasingly common tools for disinformation campaigns, capable of shaping public perception within minutes.

For many observers, this episode serves as a wake-up call. The use of AI to mimic voices and fabricate written defenses not only undermines truth but also deepens mistrust in the information ecosystem. With technology evolving rapidly, Nigerians are being urged to double-check sources, question authenticity, and remain vigilant against the weaponization of digital tools in political discourse.