You are here: HomeNews2023 10 08Article 699203

General News of Sunday, 8 October 2023

Source: gistmania.com

Soyinka challenges critics disputing his academic records to provide evidence within 30 days

Wole Soyinka Wole Soyinka

Nobel Laureate, Prof. Wole Soyinka has told those claiming he has fraudulent academic records to submit all evidence to the Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC), the Independent Corrupt Practice Commission (ICPC), and the Directorate of Prosecutions within 30 days so that they can probe him.

This is coming after one Joseph Dahip's 1998 article which referenced a 1996 report in which a scholar, Prof James Gibbs, was quoted as unravelling some claims allegedly made by Soyinka, surfaced on the internet.

Gibbs was quoted saying that he relied on a variety of sources, including contemporary Leeds publications, archival material, Soyinka’s work and “interviews I had with him” in arriving at the facts he had on Soyinka’s academic records.

The article partly read: “The claim by Professor Wole Soyinka that he obtained a first-class bachelors degree in English Literature from Leeds University has been challenged. Instead, what the Nobel laureate actually obtained from Leeds was a second-class degree. This startling revelation was made by Professor James Gibbs who has closely monitored the activities of former Leeds students in English literature.”

However, in a statement titled, ‘A moral call to amoral conscripts’, Soyinka said he's awaiting the decision of his lawyers on whether or not to file a legal action. He also said that if he's found guilty, the laws that govern fraudulent academic claims should be invoked and applied against him to the uttermost limit.

The statement read: “A document of unmatchable scurrility, last encountered during General Sani Abacha’s global campaign of calumny against opponents of his despotic, infernally venal and homicidal reign, is back in circulation. Duly modified to suit a debased internet culture, it is making its grimy rounds ironically under the auspices of a democratic political party, supposedly dedicated to an ethos of freedom of opinion and expression. The contents of that script are attributed, as before, to the scholastic industry of a Bristol schoolteacher.

“While awaiting a decision from my lawyers whether or not to dignify the current sponsors of this mouldy tract."